Dutch lawmaker appeals conviction for inciting discrimination

Published June 26, 2019
Schiphol (Netherlands): Party for Freedom (PVV) leader Geert Wilders (right) looks on before the hearing of an appeal in the criminal case against him on Tuesday. — AFP
Schiphol (Netherlands): Party for Freedom (PVV) leader Geert Wilders (right) looks on before the hearing of an appeal in the criminal case against him on Tuesday. — AFP

AMSTERDAM: Dutch anti-Islam politician Geert Wilders on Tuesday called for either an acquittal or a procedural delay in his appeal against a 2016 conviction for inciting discrimination against Moroccans.

“This trial has every appearance of being politically motivated. Stop the witch hunt!” he told judges at the Hague Appeals Court.

Wilders was convicted over a 2014 incident at a campaign rally when he asked supporters whether they wanted more or fewer Moroccans in the Netherlands. When they chanted “Fewer! Fewer! Fewer!” he replied: “We’re going to take care of that.” He was prosecuted after Dutch authorities received dozens of complaints from individuals and Muslim groups.

“I only asked a question that half of the Netherlands would answer with ‘Yes’,” Wilders told the appeals court.

The judges at his original trial found that Wilders’ remarks were insulting to Dutch Moroccans and that his right to freedom of speech did not outweigh their right to be spared incitement to discrimination. But Wilders was not fined or jailed.

Before setting out the substance of their appeal, Wilders and his lawyer Geert-Jan Knoops argued on Tuesday that the case was fundamentally flawed because prosecutors had failed to disclose the alleged involvement of then-justice minister Ivo Opstelten, a political opponent, in launching the original prosecution.

They requested a delay to allow more witnesses to be interviewed to demonstrate Opstelten’s alleged involvement and bias.

Prosecutor Gerard Sta said the minister had had no hand in the case and had only been briefed about its progress as part of routine practice.

The appeals judges were expected to rule later on Tuesday on whether to grant a delay.

Published in Dawn, June 26th, 2019

Opinion

Rule by law

Rule by law

‘The rule of law’ is being weaponised, taking on whatever meaning that fits the political objectives of those invoking it.

Editorial

Isfahan strikes
Updated 20 Apr, 2024

Isfahan strikes

True de-escalation means Israel must start behaving like a normal state, not a rogue nation that threatens the entire region.
President’s speech
20 Apr, 2024

President’s speech

PRESIDENT Asif Ali Zardari seems to have managed to hit all the right notes in his address to the joint sitting of...
Karachi terror
20 Apr, 2024

Karachi terror

IS urban terrorism returning to Karachi? Yesterday’s deplorable suicide bombing attack on a van carrying five...
X post facto
Updated 19 Apr, 2024

X post facto

Our decision-makers should realise the harm they are causing.
Insufficient inquiry
19 Apr, 2024

Insufficient inquiry

UNLESS the state is honest about the mistakes its functionaries have made, we will be doomed to repeat our follies....
Melting glaciers
19 Apr, 2024

Melting glaciers

AFTER several rain-related deaths in KP in recent days, the Provincial Disaster Management Authority has sprung into...