Questions? +1 (202) 335-3939 Login
Trusted News Since 1995
A service for political professionals · Thursday, September 5, 2024 · 741,097,192 Articles · 3+ Million Readers

NCLA Asks D.C. Circuit to Scrub NOAA’s at-Sea Monitor Rule After Toppling Chevron Deference

Loper Bright Enterprises, et al. v. Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, et al.

/EIN News/ -- Washington, D.C., Sept. 05, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- On behalf of its clients Relentless Inc., Huntress Inc. and SeaFreeze Fleet LLC, the New Civil Liberties Alliance has filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. Alongside NCLA’s Relentless Inc. v. Dept. of Commerce lawsuit, this historic case defeated the Chevron doctrine. Now, NCLA urges the Court to overturn the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) rule requiring North Atlantic fishing companies like NCLA’s Relentless clients to pay the salaries of at-sea government monitors who track their herring catch. With Chevron deference rightfully erased, this statutorily unauthorized rule must meet the same fate.

NMFS implemented the at-sea monitor rule without any statutory language supporting it. A divided panel of the D.C. Circuit ruled in Loper Bright that Congress silently empowered NMFS to promulgate this regulation. The D.C. Circuit applied Chevron deference, ruling that statutory ambiguity justified deferring to the agencies. The Supreme Court corrected this error by overturning Chevron deference in June, making fishermen-funded federal monitoring a legally unsustainable policy. The Relentless lawsuit against NMFS’s rule continues in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island.

The rule is unlawful under any sensible reading of the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA). The MSA directs fishermen to pay for monitoring in only three specific cases, and not in the New England herring fishery. Despite past claims by the government, there is no general rule that regulated industries pay for the general government functions of their regulators. This can only mean one thing: the government itself must pay, as it did for 20 years before the agencies invented the at-sea monitor rule.

NCLA released the following statement:

“The D.C. Circuit already found that the Magnuson-Stevens Act does not expressly provide the agencies with the power to force the fishing industry to pay for a government function performed by government agents for 20 years. Without such Congressional direction it should send this regulation to Davy Jones’ locker.”
— John Vecchione, Senior Litigation Counsel, NCLA

For more information visit the amicus page here.

ABOUT NCLA

NCLA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit civil rights group founded by prominent legal scholar Philip Hamburger to protect constitutional freedoms from violations by the Administrative State. NCLA’s public-interest litigation and other pro bono advocacy strive to tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies and to foster a new civil liberties movement that will help restore Americans’ fundamental rights.

###


Ruslan Moldovanov
                    New Civil Liberties Alliance
                    202-869-5237
                    ruslan.moldovanov@ncla.legal
                    
Powered by EIN News

Distribution channels: Law, Politics

Legal Disclaimer:

EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.

Submit your press release